Skip to content
Know before you taxi

All Products

My Airports

Your shortcuts, saved on this device. Search to add an airport.

No airports saved yet. Add the fields you visit most.

Ask ATIS

KYIP Runway 05/23 — Willow Run Airport

7,543 × 150 ft concrete · true headings 047° / 227° · field elevation 716 ft

Runway 05/23 at Willow Run Airport (KYIP) in Detroit, MI is 7,543 ft long and 150 ft wide, concrete, with true headings 047° and 227°. The FAA record lists ILS/DME (CAT I) and MALSR approach lights on runway 05. Over 2005–2025 the wind gave runway 05 the headwind 37.9% of the time and runway 23 62.1%, with a crosswind above 15 kt in 2.1% of wind hours. KYIP has no digital ATIS, so the active runway is not known; the wind-favored end and the ATIS Alerts prediction are estimates.

Ask ATIS AIAsk anything about KYIP's weather, runways or delays, or search another airport.

Runway 05/23 — current operational status

What the D-ATIS, the tower and current NOTAMs state now. The published FAA baseline (NASR) is a separate line in the overview below and does not reflect temporary closures.

RESTRICTED (NOTAM)
  • NOTAM 10/132: !YIP 10/132 YIP RWY 23 FICON 5/5/5 100 PCT WET OBS AT 2610291927. 2610291927-2610301927
  • NOTAM 10/102: YIP NAV ILS RWY 05 GP U/S

Sources: Published FAA baseline (OurAirports/NASR record) · FAA NOTAMs. Runway NOTAMs stream live from the FAA NOTAM Management Service (SWIM); the official text is shown verbatim below the card. Always confirm with a current briefing.

NOTAMs for runway 05/23

Official text as issued; grouped for reading only. “Scheduled” means not yet in effect. NOTAMs are received live from the FAA NOTAM Management Service through SWIM and recorded since Sep 19, 2026; a NOTAM issued before that and not re-issued since may be missing. Get a full briefing before flight.

Surface condition · 1
  • 10/132 · DOM10/29 1927Z (3:27 PM EDT) → 10/30 1927Z (3:27 PM EDT)
    !YIP 10/132 YIP RWY 23 FICON 5/5/5 100 PCT WET OBS AT 2610291927. 2610291927-2610301927
Navaid / approach equipment · 1
  • 10/102 · INTL10/21 1418Z (10:18 AM EDT) → 10/30 2000Z (4:00 PM EDT)
    YIP NAV ILS RWY 05 GP U/S
Runway visual rangeSTDDS 2003Z (4:03 PM EDT)
05 TDZ 6000+ ↑ · MID – · RO – · lights edge 0 / CL 0
23 TDZ – · MID – · RO 6000+ ↑ · lights edge 0 / CL 0

Feet, touchdown / midpoint / rollout; 6000+ is the reportable maximum and “off” means the sensor is not reporting (runway not in use). Light settings 0 (off) to 5. Not an FAA product; verify with the current METAR and ATIS.

Current runway assignment is not available from D-ATIS at KYIP. The wind components below show which end the wind favors; the section after it is an ATIS Alerts prediction. Neither is an ATC assignment.

Current wind on Runway 05/23

Wind from the west-southwest (240°) at 10 kt, gusting 19 kt

METAR 1953Z (3:53 PM EDT)
Runway 05
Tailwind
10 kt
Crosswind
2 ktfrom left
Gust crosswind
4 kt
Runway 23
FAVORED BY WIND
Headwind
10 kt
Crosswind
2 ktfrom right
Gust crosswind
4 kt
09270523N240°/10 kt
  • arrivals
  • departures
  • LAHSO hold-short
  • closed

Layout from FAA NASR runway-end coordinates; the selected runway is highlighted and no active source exists here. Not for navigation. Official FAA diagram ↗

Components use TRUE runway headings and TRUE METAR wind. “Favored by wind” is arithmetic, not an ATC assignment.

Runway 05/23 outlook

Where runway 05/23 stands now and which runway at KYIP is likely over the next 12 hours — an estimate, not an ATC assignment.

Time · runway 05/23 · airport-wide outlook · confidence · forecast wind · why

  1. Now2015Z · 4:15 PM EDT·05/23: 23 likely·airport-wide likely 23 then 27·Southwest flow·10 kt headwind, 2 kt crosswind·Low 58%·wind 240° at 10 kt G19·Why Current METAR wind 240° at 10 kt gusting 19 favors southwest-facing runway ends: 10 kt headwind and 2 kt crosswind on 23 versus 9 kt headwind on 27.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Gusts well above the steady wind (confidence lowered).
  2. +1 h2115Z · 5:15 PM EDT·05/23: not favored·airport-wide likely 27 then 23·West flow·12 kt headwind, 4 kt crosswind·Low 47%·wind 250° at 13 kt G20·Why TAF forecast wind 250° at 13 kt gusting 20 favors west-facing runway ends: 12 kt headwind and 4 kt crosswind on 27 versus 12 kt headwind on 23.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Confidence falls with forecast distance (+1 h).
  3. +2 h2215Z · 6:15 PM EDT·05/23: not favored·airport-wide likely 27 then 23·West flow·12 kt headwind, 4 kt crosswind·Low 44%·wind 250° at 13 kt G20·Why TAF forecast wind 250° at 13 kt gusting 20 favors west-facing runway ends: 12 kt headwind and 4 kt crosswind on 27 versus 12 kt headwind on 23.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Confidence falls with forecast distance (+2 h).
  4. +3 h2315Z · 7:15 PM EDT·05/23: not favored·airport-wide likely 27 then 23·West flow·12 kt headwind, 4 kt crosswind·Low 41%·wind 250° at 13 kt G20·Why TAF forecast wind 250° at 13 kt gusting 20 favors west-facing runway ends: 12 kt headwind and 4 kt crosswind on 27 versus 12 kt headwind on 23.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Confidence falls with forecast distance (+3 h).
  5. +6 h0215Z · 10:15 PM EDT·05/23: not favored·airport-wide likely 27 then 23·West flow·13 kt headwind, 2 kt crosswind·Medium 70%·wind 280° at 13 kt·Why TAF forecast wind 280° at 13 kt favors west-facing runway ends: 13 kt headwind and 2 kt crosswind on 27 versus 8 kt headwind on 23.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Confidence falls with forecast distance (+6 h).
  6. +12 h0815Z · 4:15 AM EDT·05/23: not favored·airport-wide likely 27 then 23·West flow·7 kt headwind, 4 kt crosswind·Low 43%·wind 300° at 8 kt·Why TAF forecast wind 300° at 8 kt favors northwest-facing runway ends: 7 kt headwind and 4 kt crosswind on 27 versus 2 kt headwind on 23.|No known runway closure prevents this configuration.|Confidence falls with forecast distance (+12 h).

ATIS Alerts Predicted Runway is an estimate from the TAF wind forecast, runway geometry (most headwind, crosswind penalised, tailwind over 5 kt avoided, longest runway breaks ties), the current stated configuration and any stated closures. Each row lists its reasons; “no runway favored” is a genuine answer under variable or light wind, never replaced by a guess. It is not an ATC assignment and does not know about noise abatement or traffic flow unless the recorded history shows them. TAF issued 2011Z (4:11 PM EDT).

Runway 05/23 equipment and lighting

What the FAA record lists for each end, annotated with current NOTAM and D-ATIS outages.

Runway 05
Approach lighting
MALSR
Visual glide slope
PAPI (4-box, left side)
Runway edge lighting
HIRL (high intensity)
Centerline lighting
Available
Touchdown zone lighting
Available
REIL
Not available
ILS
ILS/DMEDEGRADED
I-YIP · 109.5 MHz · CAT I
NOTAM 10/102 · out of service until 10/30 2000Z (4:00 PM EDT)
YIP NAV ILS RWY 05 GP U/S
Localizer
Available
Glideslope
AvailableOUT OF SERVICE
3°
NOTAM 10/102 · out of service until 10/30 2000Z (4:00 PM EDT)
YIP NAV ILS RWY 05 GP U/S
DME
Available
channel 32X
Marker beacons
Not available
RVR
touchdown
Runway markings
Precision instrument
condition good
Arresting system
Not available
Runway 23
Approach lighting
MALSR
Visual glide slope
PAPI (4-box, left side)
Runway edge lighting
HIRL (high intensity)
Centerline lighting
Available
Touchdown zone lighting
Not available
REIL
Not available
ILS
ILS/DME
I-LSW · 109.5 MHz · CAT I
Localizer
Available
Glideslope
Available
3°
DME
Available
channel 32X
Marker beacons
Not available
RVR
rollout
Runway markings
Precision instrument
condition good
Arresting system
Not available

Source: FAA NASR 28-day subscription, cycle effective 2026-10-01 (equipment on record) · FAA NOTAMs via SWIM (live)and the current D-ATIS (outages). “Not available” means the FAA record lists no such equipment for the end; nothing here is inferred. An outage annotation is only ever a reading of the official text shown with it. Declared distances are not shown in this phase.

Land and hold short operations

LAHSO hold-short points and available landing distances on the FAA record, and whether the current D-ATIS reports LAHSO in effect.

Runway 05

No LAHSO hold-short point on the FAA record for this end.

Runway 23

No LAHSO hold-short point on the FAA record for this end.

This airport has no D-ATIS, so the current LAHSO state is not known here. Source: FAA NASR cycle 2026-10-01; D-ATIS text read by ATIS Alerts.

Frequencies for runway 05/23

Tower, ground, clearance, ATIS and approach frequencies from the FAA record, labelled by what they apply to.

Frequencies serving runway 05/23 at KYIP
ServiceFrequencyApplies to
Tower125.275Airport-wide
Tower256.9Airport-wide
Ground119.975Airport-wide
ATIS127.425Airport-wide
Show all frequencies (2 more: approach and departure sectors, secondary and other)
Frequencies serving runway 05/23 at KYIP
ServiceFrequencyApplies to
Approach / departure118.95Airport-wide
Approach / departure284.0Airport-wide

The FAA record does not sectorize KYIP's frequencies by runway; every row applies airport-wide. Source: FAA NASR FRQ, cycle 2026-10-01. Verify on the current chart supplement before use.

Runway 05/23 overview

Physical characteristics from the FAA-derived runway record.

Length
7,543 ft
Width
150 ft
Surface
Concrete · Good condition
Surface treatment
Grooved
Weight bearing (lb)
S 100k · D 200k · 2D 350k · 2D/2D2 800k
PCN
800
Runway lights
Lighted
Airport elevation
716 ft
Published FAA baseline
Open
Published NASR record; does not reflect temporary closures or restrictions. Current operational status is the card at the top of the page.
Runway 05
True heading
047°
Magnetic
053°
Published FAA baseline
Open
Threshold elevation
714 ft
TDZ elevation
716 ft
Displaced threshold
None on record
Threshold crossing height
75 ft
Visual glide path
3°
Traffic pattern
Left
Controlling obstruction
tree, 74 ft, 2,434 ft from threshold, 30:1 slope
Runway 23
True heading
227°
Magnetic
233°
Published FAA baseline
Open
Threshold elevation
702 ft
TDZ elevation
710 ft
Displaced threshold
None on record
Threshold crossing height
56 ft
Visual glide path
3°
Traffic pattern
Left
Controlling obstruction
tree, 39 ft, 1,387 ft from threshold, 29:1 slope

Runway 05/23 numbers are magnetic; the stored geometry and every wind calculation on this page are TRUE north, so they never need a variation correction. Magnetic headings use the FAA's published variation for this airport, 6.0°W (1995), the same value printed on the FAA airport diagram. Surface condition, treatment, weight bearing, thresholds and traffic pattern are from the FAA NASR record (cycle 2026-10-01); lighting, ILS and LAHSO are in their own sections above. Declared distances are not shown in this phase.

Wind-favored runway at KYIP — last 30 days

Which runway end had the most headwind each hour, from ATIS Alerts' collected wind history — an estimate, not ATC use.

Wind-favored runway - past 30 days

Share of hours each runway had the most headwind. From wind reports, not ATC assignments.

23
37%
05
24%
27
22%
09
17%

Historical wind and crosswind on runway 05/23

20-year hourly climatology from the ASOS archive, computed per runway end.

From 174,543 hourly observations at KYIP (2005–2025), 150,654 with a steady wind direction (13.7% calm, variable or direction-less). One observation per clock hour; TRUE headings against TRUE wind.

Crosswind on runway 05/23 (either end)

Mean crosswind
5 kt
median 4.2 kt
90th / 95th percentile
10.3 / 12.5 kt
max 30.3 kt
Above 10 kt
10.7%
> 15 kt: 2.1% · > 20 kt: 0.2%
Gust crosswind > 15 kt
6.1%
90th pct gust 11.7 kt
0%34%68%59%0–5 kt31%5–10 kt8.6%10–15 kt1.8%15–20 kt0.2%20–25 kt0.0%25+ kt
Share of wind hours by crosswind band on runway 05/23 at KYIP, 2005–2025
Crosswind (kt)Share of wind hours
0–558.8%
5–1030.5%
10–158.6%
15–201.8%
20–250.2%
25+0%

Strongest-crosswind month on average: Apr; calmest: Jul. Percentiles are streaming approximations (t-digest), accurate to about 0.1 kt.

Runway 05

Headwind
37.9%
of wind hours
Tailwind > 5 kt
34.5%
> 10 kt: 13.2%
Most wind-favored end
20%
of steady-wind hours, 05 had the most headwind of every end at KYIP

Runway 23

Headwind
62.1%
of wind hours
Tailwind > 5 kt
13.8%
> 10 kt: 3%
Most wind-favored end
34.5%
of steady-wind hours, 23 had the most headwind of every end at KYIP

“Most wind-favored end” is meteorological analysis: the share of steady-wind hours (2005–2025) in which this end had the most headwind of every open runway end at KYIP. It does not mean ATC selected the runway that often (parallel ends with the same heading share the credit equally). Observed runway use, where available, is the configuration-history section above.

By wind direction

Wind-favored share of runway 05 and 23 by wind sector, 2005–2025
Wind fromShare of wind hours05 favored23 favoredMean crosswindCrosswind > 15 kt
N 338–023°11%100%0%5.8 kt1.4%
NE 023–068°9%100%0%1.2 kt0%
E 068–113°8%0%0%4.9 kt0.1%
SE 113–158°7%0%0%6.9 kt0.9%
S 158–203°14%0%100%5 kt0.3%
SW 203–248°21%0%100%1.7 kt0%
W 248–293°16%0%0%7.1 kt4.9%
NW 293–338°14%0%0%8.7 kt7.5%

By time of day (airport-local)

morning
05 favored 22.2% · 23 36.2%
mean crosswind 4.8 kt · calm 14.4%
afternoon
05 favored 15.9% · 23 34.1%
mean crosswind 6.2 kt · calm 8.4%
evening
05 favored 16.7% · 23 32%
mean crosswind 5.2 kt · calm 8.4%
night
05 favored 23.5% · 23 34.9%
mean crosswind 4.1 kt · calm 19.8%

Seasonal runway conditions

037JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Mean crosswind on runway 05/23 at KYIP by month, 2005–2025
MonthMean crosswind (kt)
Jan5.1 kt
Feb5.6 kt
Mar5.9 kt
Apr6.0 kt
May5.0 kt
Jun4.6 kt
Jul4.2 kt
Aug4.3 kt
Sep4.2 kt
Oct4.9 kt
Nov5.2 kt
Dec5.0 kt
Monthly wind and weather statistics for runway 05/23 at KYIP, 2005–2025
MonthPrevailingMean windGustyMean xwxw > 10xw > 15xw > 2005 tail > 523 tail > 5IFRTSFog
JanSW8.9 kt11.4%5.1 kt12%2.5%0.3%47.8%10%15.6%0.02%13.1%
FebSW9.1 kt13.4%5.6 kt15.2%3.7%0.6%41.3%15.1%12.6%0.04%10%
MarNW8.9 kt16%5.9 kt15.8%3.7%0.3%30.1%21.3%8%0.09%6.9%
AprW9 kt19%6 kt16.6%3.9%0.6%29.6%22%6%0.31%5.3%
MaySW7.4 kt12.2%5 kt9.7%1.4%0.1%26.2%20.4%5.5%0.35%5.5%
JunSW6.7 kt9.8%4.6 kt7.7%1%0.1%29.9%12.6%3.7%0.68%3.8%
JulSW6 kt6.7%4.2 kt5.2%0.5%0%30.4%8.8%2.4%0.7%3.9%
AugSW5.7 kt5.8%4.3 kt5.1%0.4%0%25.9%9.8%4.1%0.74%6%
SepSW5.8 kt6.6%4.2 kt5.6%0.7%0%23.3%15.1%6.6%0.31%8.4%
OctSW7.4 kt12%4.9 kt10.1%1.8%0.2%36.3%12.8%6.3%0.06%6.3%
NovSW8.2 kt12.6%5.2 kt12.4%2.3%0.2%44.5%8.3%7.4%0.06%9.8%
DecSW8.6 kt11.6%5 kt11.2%2.5%0.4%45.1%9.4%14.2%0.01%13.6%

IFR, thunderstorm (TS) and fog columns are airport-wide shares of hours; the crosswind and tailwind columns are specific to this runway. Prevailing = most common 45° wind sector among wind hours.

Runway 05/23 closure history

Kept per source with its provenance: D-ATIS-observed, NOTAM-observed and the FAA published baseline are never merged.

KYIP has no D-ATIS, so there is no broadcast-observed closure record.

NOTAM observed · recorded since Sep 19, 2026 (no archive before that)
  • 10/126 · partial closure (partial) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-28 12:21Z → 2026-10-28 18:05Z · first seen 2026-10-28 17:40Z · last seen 2026-10-28 17:40Z
    TWY G BTN RWY 05/23 AND WEST RAMP CLSD
  • 10/119 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-27 12:00Z → 2026-10-27 13:00Z · first seen 2026-10-27 12:03Z · last seen 2026-10-27 12:03Z
    !YIP 10/119 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610271200-2610271300
  • 10/116 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-27 10:12Z → 2026-10-27 11:30Z · first seen 2026-10-27 11:02Z · last seen 2026-10-27 11:02Z
    RWY 05/23 CLSD
  • 10/116 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-27 10:12Z → 2026-10-27 11:30Z · first seen 2026-10-27 10:14Z · last seen 2026-10-27 11:01Z · cancelled 2026-10-27 11:01Z
    !YIP 10/116 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610271012-2610271130
  • 10/115 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-27 09:47Z → 2026-10-27 11:00Z · first seen 2026-10-27 09:49Z · last seen 2026-10-27 10:12Z · cancelled 2026-10-27 10:12Z
    !YIP 10/115 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610270947-2610271100
  • 10/112 · partial closure (partial) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-27 09:25Z → 2026-10-27 11:30Z · first seen 2026-10-27 09:44Z · last seen 2026-10-27 09:44Z
    TWY G1, G2, G3, G4, TWY G BTN RWY 05/23 AND TXL B CLSD
  • 10/108 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-26 12:11Z → 2026-10-26 16:00Z · first seen 2026-10-26 12:13Z · last seen 2026-10-26 15:36Z · cancelled 2026-10-26 15:37Z
    !YIP 10/108 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610261211-2610261600
  • 10/108 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-26 12:11Z → 2026-10-26 16:00Z · first seen 2026-10-26 15:38Z · last seen 2026-10-26 15:38Z
    RWY 05/23 CLSD
  • 10/107 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-24 01:20Z → 2026-10-24 23:59Z · first seen 2026-10-24 01:22Z · last seen 2026-10-24 01:50Z · cancelled 2026-10-24 01:50Z
    !YIP 10/107 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610240120-2610242359
  • 10/107 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-24 01:20Z → 2026-10-24 23:59Z · first seen 2026-10-24 01:51Z · last seen 2026-10-24 01:51Z
    RWY 05/23 CLSD
  • 10/106 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-22 14:22Z → 2026-10-22 15:00Z · first seen 2026-10-22 14:30Z · last seen 2026-10-22 14:30Z
    !YIP 10/106 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610221422-2610221500
  • 10/105 · closure (full) · runway 05/23effective 2026-10-22 13:48Z → 2026-10-22 15:00Z · first seen 2026-10-22 13:49Z · last seen 2026-10-22 14:11Z · cancelled 2026-10-22 14:11Z
    !YIP 10/105 YIP RWY 05/23 CLSD 2610221348-2610221500
Published FAA baseline (NASR record)

Runway 05/23: Open on the published record — a baseline that does not reflect temporary closures or restrictions, not the current operational status.

Recent pilot reports involving runway 05/23

Official PIREPs that name this runway explicitly, past 6 hours.

No pilot report in the last 6 hours names runway 05/23 at KYIP explicitly. Reports near the airport that do not name a runway are on the airport page.

Instrument approaches to runway 05/23

From the FAA d-TPP, linked to the official plates.

Runway 05

Runway 23

Circling / other approaches at KYIP

14 departure procedures · 4 STARs · FAA d-TPP cycle 2611. Plates open on aeronav.faa.gov (public domain); ATIS Alerts does not reproduce charts or minimums.

Methodology and sources

Short version below; the full write-up is at Runway Intelligence methodology, and every launched airport is listed on the Runway Intelligence hub.

  • Active runwayscome first from the tower's TFDM (Terminal Flight Data Manager) airport configuration, received as structured data through the FAA SWIM Cloud Distribution Service at towers that have it; otherwise from the airport's D-ATIS text (community relay of the FAA broadcast) with an open, tested parser, and the broadcast text is always shown. Every change is recorded, so “recorded use” is what the facility stated, never an inference. ATIS Alerts is not an FAA product and this is not FAA data; SWIM content is for non-operational use.
  • Flowis the compass direction of the stated arrival ends (eight sectors, named only when every arrival end points within 30° of the others and clear of a sector edge); a tower's own configuration name is used when it carries a direction word. Stored separately from the runway sets.
  • Equipment, LAHSO and frequencies come from the FAA NASR 28-day subscription (cycle 2026-10-01): approach lights, visual glide slope, edge / centerline / touchdown-zone lights, REIL, ILS components with FAA status, RVR, markings, LAHSO hold-short points and available landing distances, and facility frequencies with their published sectorization. Outage annotations are readings of the NOTAM or D-ATIS text shown beside them. Blank FAA fields read “Not available”.
  • Wind components use the current METAR (aviationweather.gov) against TRUE runway headings from the OurAirports/FAA runway record.
  • Runway visual range, tower demand and traffic-management restrictions come from FAA SWIM: STDDS Airport Data (RVR and light settings, about 130 airports) and TFDM (15-minute runway demand, APREQ/MIT restrictions). Each block is stamped with its own time; none of it is an FAA product or a clearance.
  • Predicted runway scores each open end from the TAF wind (headwind, crosswind penalty, tailwind avoidance, longest-runway tie-break), excludes stated closures, and — once a wind sector has 24 h of recorded use — adjusts confidence by what the facility did under similar wind; every row lists its reasons. It does not model noise abatement or flow programs beyond what the record shows.
  • History thresholds: usage shares need 12 / 48 / 168 recorded hours for the 24-hour / 7-day / 30-day windows; a wind sector needs 24 h and 5 days; time-of-day needs 7 days and 20 h per daypart; flow shares need 48 h. Below a bar the module says so instead of showing a percentage.
  • Climatology: Iowa Environmental Mesonet ASOS archive, one observation per hour, 45° wind sectors, percentiles via t-digest; runway geometry is today's record applied to all years. Methodology v1.
  • PIREPs: official reports from aviationweather.gov are attached only when the text names this runway and the report is tied to KYIP by identifier or by position within 15 NM. Approaches: FAA d-TPP metafile, current charting cycle; plates link to aeronav.faa.gov. No minimums are reproduced.
  • Data freshness: METAR and D-ATIS refresh every minute on this page; the D-ATIS recorder ran 5 min ago; usage rollups every 3 h; climatology through 2025-12-31.

Get free ATIS alerts for KYIP

We'll message you on Telegram the moment a new METAR changes the picture at KYIP (Willow Run Airport): flight category, wind, or ceiling past your minimums.

Track KYIP on Telegram

Free • no app to install • unsubscribe anytime

Other runways at KYIP

← KYIP live weather, METAR, TAF

Tools for this runway

KYIP airport diagram

Official FAA taxiway and runway layout. Tap to zoom.

Official FAA airport diagram · d-TPP cycle 2611 · Not for navigation. Download the official FAA PDF ↗

⚠️ ATIS Alerts provides informational runway analysis based on available weather, the tower's TFDM configuration and NOTAMs received through FAA SWIM, D-ATIS text, FAA data and historical observations. Active runways shown here are what the tower or its D-ATIS stated and may lag or be misread; NOTAM coverage is not complete; predicted runways are an ATIS Alerts estimate, not an ATC assignment; equipment states are readings of the official text shown with them. Not an FAA product. Not for operational use. Always verify with official FAA-approved preflight weather sources before flight.